I had recently been asked to give a talk about “being an American Muslim in the United States.” Although wary of the uses and abuses of the term, I obliged.
Do CounterPunch, 5 de Março, 2017
Por RAMZY BAROUD
Islam is a religion propelled by values, not race nor, theoretically, by blind tribal allegiances, I explained.
The ‘American Muslim’ identity which has been under constant investigation in US media, politics and society is completely different from what American Muslims associate themselves with.
The media’s ‘American Muslim’ is a suspect, a fifth column, potentially dangerous and more receptive to violence than every other collective identity in the US. While this contrasts sharply with real Islam, facts hardly matter in the age of American nationalism, predicated on cultural and religious identification and ‘alternative facts’.
Caught within this brutal, baseless logic, some American Muslims no longer define themselves around their own political priorities, nor do they mobilize themselves alongside their natural allies – those who come from historically oppressed communities. Instead, they have taken to apologizing for their ‘Muslim-ness’, rather than demand an apology, justice and equality.
Many Muslims find themselves, as a collective, being forced to demonstrate their humanity, defend their religion and distance themselves from every act of violence, even if only allegedly committed by a Muslim anywhere in the world.
Long before the Trump Administration’s ‘Muslim Ban’ – banning citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the US for 90 days – Muslims in the US have always, to varied degrees, been embattled, collectively demonized, racially profiled by government agencies and targeted in numerous hate-crimes by fellow Americans.
In reality, hatred of Muslims goes back even before 9/11, and the US war in Iraq in 1990-91 – a hatred based solely on media fear-mongering and Hollywood stereotyping.
There is also an odd ‘discovery’ by various liberal groups that American Muslims are mistreated in their own country.
In truth, the cause of the ‘defenseless Muslim’ is used as a political tool, with Democrats and others attempting to undermine the actions of their Republican rivals.
The administrations of Democratic presidents, Barack Obama and Bill Clinton, both had horrific legacies of violence and discrimination against Muslim countries.
In a landmark study released in March 2015, the Washington-based group, Physicians for Social Responsibly, showed that the US self-styled ‘war on terror’ had killed anywhere between 1.3 million to 2 million Muslims in the first ten years since the September 11 attacks.
Award-winning investigative journalist, Nafeez Ahmed, concluded that at least 4 million Muslims have been killed by the US since 1990.
This excludes killings that have taken place in the last two years, or the countless civilians who perished during the US-sanctions on Iraq, starting 1991, which were enforced throughout the Clinton Administrations.
Yet, all this is meant to be ignored and seen merely as the issue of an obnoxious president and that the pinnacle of the American violence against Muslims can be reduced to a 90-day travel ban on selected countries.
Subscribing to this mischaracterization reflects both ignorance and also complete disregard for the millions of innocent lives that have been lost, in order for the US to preserve its vastly dwindling empire.
At the Democratic Party National Convention (DNC) last July, former President Bill Clinton took the stage to articulate a retort to the Republican party convention’s hate-fest of Muslims, Blacks, Latinos and everyone else who did not subscribe to their skewed view of the world.
But Clinton’s words were a mere liberal spin on the same chauvinistic, racist and exclusionist culture that often drives the political discourse of the Right.
“If you’re a Muslim and you love America and freedom and you hate terror, stay here and help us win and make a future together, we want you,” Clinton said before a large audience, which roared in applause.
For Muslims, feeling that their inclusion, citizenship and humanity are conditioned by a set of condescending rules, articulated by a White, Christian elite, is utterly dehumanizing.
What Clinton has wished to forget is that an estimated third of the slaves who built his country were, in fact, Muslims – shackled and dragged against their will to assemble the United States, field by field and brick by brick. It is the slaves that mainly brought Islam to America, and it is Islam that armed them with the virtue of patience and strength of character in order to survive one of the most ghastly genocides in human history.
Precisely for this reason, the identity of the American Muslim is, at its heart, a political one, concerned with human rights, justice and equality, with Black Muslims playing a tremendous role in confronting, challenging and clashing with the ruling White elitist order that controlled the US from the beginning.
It is the Martin-Luther King Jr.-Malcolm X-type movements – backed by millions of Black people throughout the country – that helped define the modern character of the Black American. They led the Civil Rights Movement, exacting basic human rights at a heavy price and against terrible odds.
It is important that American Muslim youth understand this well, and that their fight for equality and human rights in their country is not a manifestation of some Democratic Party’s political game.
Those aspiring to be the ‘good Muslim’, the Uncle Tom, the ‘not-all- Muslims- are- terrorists’ type, can only hope for a second-class status. But those who aspire for true equality and justice ought to remember the words of American revolutionary, Assata Shakur: “Nobody in the world, nobody in history, has ever gotten their freedom by appealing to the moral sense of people who were oppressing them.”
The oppressors constantly try to redefine the nature of the struggle of those whom they oppress. For Bill Clinton, the issue is solely Islamic terrorism, never the terror inflicted upon Muslim nations by his and other administrations through a series of unjust wars and sanctions, killing millions.
The colonizer, oppressor, invader is always blind to his crimes. He sees only the violent reaction – however minuscule – of the people whom he subjugates.
According to the New America Foundation, alleged ‘Jihadists’ killed 94 people in the US from 2005-2015, during which time the US also killed nearly 2 million Muslims in their own countries.
Yet, the government media-driven, fear-mongering, anti-Muslim and anti-Islam discourse (for which both liberals and conservatives are equally responsible) has made terrorism the leading fear among Americans, according to a major national survey in 2016.
In his book, Wretched of the Earth, one of the 20th century most powerful revolutionary voices, Frantz Fanon, wrote, “Each generation must discover its mission, fulfill it or betray it, in relative opacity.”
For this generation of American Muslims, this is their moment – to discover and fulfill their mission, to define and assert who they are as the descendants of slaves, immigrants and refugees – the three main building blocs of America.
Join the debate on Facebook
Dr. Ramzy Baroud has been writing about the Middle East for over 20 years. He is an internationally-syndicated columnist, a media consultant, an author of several books and the founder of PalestineChronicle.com. His latest book is My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza’s Untold Story (Pluto Press, London). His website is: ramzybaroud.net
Grupo de Pesquisa Sul-Sur
Este grupo se insere numa das linhas de pesquisa do LABMUNDO-BA/NPGA/EA/UFBA, Laboratório de Análise Política Mundial, Bahia, do Núcleo de Pós-graduação da Escola de Administração da UFBA. O grupo é formado por pesquisadores de diferentes áreas do conhecimento e de diferentes instituições públicas de ensino e pesquisa.
Buscamos nos apropriar do conhecimento das inter-relações das dinâmicas socioespaciais (políticas, econômicas, culturais) dos países da América do Sul, especialmente do Brasil, da Bolívia, da Argentina e do Chile, privilegiando a análise histórica, que nos permite captar as especificidades do chamado “subdesenvolvimento”, expressas, claramente, na organização das economias dos diversos povos, nos grupos sociais, no espaço.
Nosso campo de investigação dialoga com os campos da Geopolítica, Geografia Crítica, da Economia Política e da Ecologia Política. Pretendemos compreender as novas cartografias que vêm se desenhando na América do Sul nos dois circuitos da economia postulados por Milton Santos, o circuito inferior e o circuito superior. Construiremos, desse modo, algumas cartografias de ação, inspirados na proposta da socióloga Ana Clara Torres Ribeiro, especialmente dos diversos movimentos sociopolíticos dessa região, das últimas décadas do século XX à contemporaneidade.
Interessa-nos, sobretudo, a compreensão e a visibilidade das diferentes reações e movimentos dos países do Sul à dinâmica hegemônica global, os espaços de cooperação e integração criados, as potencialidades de criação de novos espaços e os seus significados para o fortalecimento da integração e da cooperação entre os países do Sul, do ponto de vista de outros paradigmas de civilização, a partir de uma epistemologia do sul. Através das cartografias de ação, buscamos perceber as antigas e novas formas de organização social e política, bem como os espaços de cooperação SUL-SUL aí gestados. Consideramos a integração e a cooperação Sul-Sul como espaços potenciais da construção de novos caminhos de civilização que superem a violência do desenvolvimento da forma em que ele é postulado e praticado.
Notícias
Africa
Agroecologia
Alienação
Amazônia
América Latina
Argentina
Arte
Bali
Biopirataria
Boaventura Sousa
Bolívia
Brasil
Buen Vivir
Campo Refugiados
Canada
Capitalismo
Chile
China
Ciência e Tecnologia
Cinema
Cisjordânia
Civilização
Colômbia
Colonialidade
Condição Feminina
Conflitos
Congresso
Corrupção
Crise
Crise Moral
Cuba
Democracia
Democrácia
Desemprego
Diplomacia Militar
Direitos Humanos
Ditadura Civil- Militar
Divida
Dívida Egíto
Droga
Drones
Ecologia
Economia
Educação
Educação Rural México
Empreendedorismo
Equador
Escravidão
Esquerda
Estado
Estados Unidos
EUA
Europa
Europeismo
Evasão de Capital
Exclusão
Exploração
Folclore
Forum Social
Fotografia
França
Futuro
Geografia Crítica
Geopolitica
Geopolítica
Gerencialismo
Golpe
Grécia
Greve
Guerra
História
humanidade
Ilhas Malvinas
Imigração
Imperialismo
Imprensa
Indígenas
Indústria
Industrialização. Brasil
Informação
Integração
Intervenção humanitária
Iran
Israel
Jornalismo
Literatura
Lombardia
Luta de Classe
Machismo
Marxismo
Medicina
Medos
Meio Ambiente
Mercosul
México
Mídia
Migrantes
Milícias kurdas
Mineração
Modelo Liberal Periférico
Montrèal
Movimento Estudantil
Movimentos Populares
Mulheres
Mundialização
Nazismo
Neocolonialismo
Neurociência
Noam Chomsky
Ocidente
ONG
Orçamento Público
Oriente Médio
Palestina
Paraguai
Pensamento
Peru
Pesamento Econômico
Petróleo
po
Poesia
Política
Políticas Neoliberais
Portugal
Precarização
Previdência
Produção Global
Questão Agrária
Redes de Computador
Refugiados
Relações Exteriores
Renda Básica
Renda Básica. Europa
Revolução
Russia
São Paulo
Saúde
Síria
Solidariedade
STF
Trabalho
Trabalho Infantil
Transnacionais
Tratado livre comércio
Universidade
Uruguai
Venezuela
violência
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário